WFIS-BASE

WIKINDX Resources

Kuszyk-Bytniewska, M. (2010). Dylemat rozumu scholastycznego: racjonalne kontra socjologiczne rekonstrukcje rozwoju wiedzy. Annales UMCS Sectio I Philosophia-Sociologia, XXXV(z. 2), 195–205. 
Added by: Mariola Kuszyk-Bytniewska (24 Sep 2012 23:43:06 Europe/Warsaw)   Last edited by: Mariola Kuszyk-Bytniewska (03 Jan 2013 17:07:24 Europe/Warsaw)
Resource type: Journal Article
BibTeX citation key: KuszykBytniewska2010a
View all bibliographic details
Categories: General
Creators: Kuszyk-Bytniewska
Collection: Annales UMCS Sectio I Philosophia-Sociologia
Views: 14/370
Views index: 54%
Popularity index: 13.5%
Attachments  
Pozostałe czasopisma    y
Added by: Mariola Kuszyk-Bytniewska  Last edited by: Mariola Kuszyk-Bytniewska
Abstract
Dilemma of a scholastic reason: rational versus sociological reconstructions of the delelopment knowledge

The aim of this paper is to answer, according to Pierre Bourdieu’s “very French” theory,
to the questions: What makes possible opposition like rational, versus sociological
reconstruction of knowledge? Above all, what are the consequences and limitations
such a formula? From the accepted point of view, I argue it is “scholastic reason”
(term proposed by Bourdieu) which is responsible for problematization in that way.
But if we assume that “rationality” has its meaning outside epistemology, it seems,
this opposition is a false problematization. I should not conclude without remaining,
that social epistemology in Bourdieu style, is a form of critical philosophy, directed
at philosophy itself.
Added by: Mariola Kuszyk-Bytniewska  Last edited by: Mariola Kuszyk-Bytniewska
wikindx 5.2.beta 1 ©2017 | Total resources: 302 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: American Psychological Association (APA) | Database queries: 50 | DB execution: 0.21622 secs | Script execution: 0.23463 secs